W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-hydra@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Documenting implicit rdfs:domains of Hydra properties

From: Jindřich Mynarz <mynarzjindrich@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:27:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CAE=8Bu_F3gHKXFfVeJqj8BUgOWg6B9NxMmj4Rc6N4KGnY2mpwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-hydra@w3.org
Cc: public-linked-data-fragments@w3.org
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Markus Lanthaler
<markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:
>> It's currently defined as "A IRI template that can be
>> used to query a collection" (note a typo: "A*n* IRI"), which hints
>> that it's rdfs:domain is hydra:Collection. This is not captured
>> explicitly in the RDF description of Hydra.
> Yeah, that's true. But I think we should rather fix the description and not the domain. Or we use schema:domainIncludes (probably better). hydra:search isn't very well defined at the moment.

I think I'd prefer using schema:domainIncludes (because of its
intended owl:unionOf-like semantics). When you say that we should fix
the description of hydra:search, do you mean that it should be
broadened to not only hint to hydra:Collection?

BTW, why have you redirected the thread to the
public-linked-data-fragments@w3.org mailing list? Is this a new
mailing list for Linked Data Fragments?

- Jindřich

Jindřich Mynarz
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2014 10:28:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:53:59 UTC