- From: Jindřich Mynarz <mynarzjindrich@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:27:38 +0200
- To: public-hydra@w3.org
- Cc: public-linked-data-fragments@w3.org
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: >> It's currently defined as "A IRI template that can be >> used to query a collection" (note a typo: "A*n* IRI"), which hints >> that it's rdfs:domain is hydra:Collection. This is not captured >> explicitly in the RDF description of Hydra. > > Yeah, that's true. But I think we should rather fix the description and not the domain. Or we use schema:domainIncludes (probably better). hydra:search isn't very well defined at the moment. I think I'd prefer using schema:domainIncludes (because of its intended owl:unionOf-like semantics). When you say that we should fix the description of hydra:search, do you mean that it should be broadened to not only hint to hydra:Collection? BTW, why have you redirected the thread to the public-linked-data-fragments@w3.org mailing list? Is this a new mailing list for Linked Data Fragments? - Jindřich -- Jindřich Mynarz http://mynarz.net/#jindrich
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2014 10:28:26 UTC