W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-hydra@w3.org > June 2014

Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (ISSUE-41)

From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 22:06:51 +0200
Message-ID: <5398B6DB.5040208@wwelves.org>
To: public-hydra@w3.org
Great to see you working hard on addressing what seems like a very
common problem!

On 06/11/2014 12:11 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
>>> PS I don't feel as strongly about this particular issue as some e-mails
> seem to indicate;
>>> I just want to help ensure that we pick the right names for terms.
> Better to get this right now as otherwise we have to live with it forever.
> So thanks for bringing in other perspectives to look at these things.

I tried to follow this thread but you may think bit to fast for me ;)

I understand that you have found a preffered pattern for implementing it
and now try to pick terms which will help expressing it in the most
clear way?

I guess you could have lost few other people during this mental sprint.
Could you imagine clearly restating current direction and invite more
people to give feedback on choosing particular terms?

I also don't really understand how this thread relates to parallel one
on schema.org mailing list around ItemList

Oh, since LDP Container got mentioned in some previous conversation
maybe also worth adding a comment to the wiki with short comparison of
design choices?

Please don't let me slow you down with those suggestions/request, just
wanted say that now everyone may find capacity to keep up with your pace

Keep up the good work!
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2014 20:09:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:53:59 UTC