- From: Thomas Hoppe <thomas.hoppe@n-fuse.de>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 04:41:46 -0400
- To: public-hydra@w3.org
Yea, potentialStatus is synonym to possibleStatus to me, as both express the existence of a status but also hint that they are not limited to the ones enumerated. So I'm also fine with that. On 07/25/2014 09:50 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to get some more opinions about this naming decision here > before I mark the issue as resolved. We have two candidates "possibleStatus" > and "potentialStatus". Thomas said: > > On 22 Jul 2014 at 00:11, Thomas Hoppe wrote: >> I vote for possibleStatus or just status as we >> could just describe in prose that the property conveys >> the meaning of a potential Status. > I personally would prefer potentialStatus as I think it is less definitive > (other statuses are possible as well). Thomas, why do you prefer > possibleStatus? > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > > >
Received on Saturday, 26 July 2014 08:42:17 UTC