Re: Call for consensus: Do not introduce RetrieveResourceOperation (ISSUE-5) and remove other Operation types (ISSUE-11)

+1

Chris

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
> To: public-hydra@w3.org
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 11:02:34 AM
> Subject: Call for consensus: Do not introduce RetrieveResourceOperation (ISSUE-5) and remove other Operation types
> (ISSUE-11)
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> In April [1] I sent out a mail with proposals for many of our open issues.
> We had lots of discussions since then. Today I'm sending out a couple of
> consensus calls for what I believe are rather uncontroversial issues and
> proposals.
> 
> There have been discussions to introduce a RetrieveResourceOperation
> (ISSUE-5 [2]) given that we have other predefined operation types. These
> predefined operation types have, however, been a great source of confusion
> (ISSUE-11 [3]). The proposal is thus to *not* introduce
> RetrieveResourceOperation and accordingly to *remove*
> CreateResourceOperation, DeleteResourceOperation, and
> ReplaceResourceOperation. In the examples in the specification, we will
> replace them with their schema.org counterparts if necessary.
> If we decide to do this, we can also close ISSUE-4 [4].
> 
> This serves as a call for consensus. Before I proceed with marking the issue
> as resolved and implementing the changes in the spec, I would like to ask if
> anyone has any concerns or objections against this proposal.
> 
> Please submit your comments by Wednesday, July 23rd.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Markus
> 
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hydra/2014Apr/0050.html
> [2] https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/5
> [3] https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/11
> [4] https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/4
> 
> 
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 18:34:44 UTC