Re: Call for consensus on documenting how "errors" can be given an identifier and be reused (ISSUE-39)

Gregg Kellogg
gregg@greggkellogg.net

On Jul 16, 2014, at 10:15 AM, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:

> This is closely related to the call for consensus on ISSUE-27 [1] I just
> sent out a minute ago (yeah, I should have combined these two [2]).
> 
> The proposals is to document in the specification how errors or possible
> statuses in general can be given an identifier (a IRI) that can then be
> directly reused in responses so that clients can recognize these
> states/errors and automatically recover in certain cases.

+0

> This serves as a call for consensus on the proposed solution. Before I
> proceed with marking the issue as resolved and implementing the changes in
> the spec, I would like to ask if anyone has any concerns or objections
> against this proposal.
> 
> Please submit your comments by Wednesday, July 23rd.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Markus
> 
> 
> [1] https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/27
> [2] https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/39
> 
> 
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 17:32:02 UTC