- From: Thomas Hoppe <thomas.hoppe@n-fuse.de>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:09:07 +0200
- To: public-hydra@w3.org
Ok, from my side. On 07/16/2014 07:02 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > Hello everyone, > > In April [1] I sent out a mail with proposals for many of our open issues. > We had lots of discussions since then. Today I'm sending out a couple of > consensus calls for what I believe are rather uncontroversial issues and > proposals. > > There have been discussions to introduce a RetrieveResourceOperation > (ISSUE-5 [2]) given that we have other predefined operation types. These > predefined operation types have, however, been a great source of confusion > (ISSUE-11 [3]). The proposal is thus to *not* introduce > RetrieveResourceOperation and accordingly to *remove* > CreateResourceOperation, DeleteResourceOperation, and > ReplaceResourceOperation. In the examples in the specification, we will > replace them with their schema.org counterparts if necessary. > If we decide to do this, we can also close ISSUE-4 [4]. > > This serves as a call for consensus. Before I proceed with marking the issue > as resolved and implementing the changes in the spec, I would like to ask if > anyone has any concerns or objections against this proposal. > > Please submit your comments by Wednesday, July 23rd. > > > Thanks, > Markus > > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hydra/2014Apr/0050.html > [2] https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/5 > [3] https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/11 > [4] https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/4 > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 17:09:42 UTC