- From: Philipp Zins <pipo@senaeh.de>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 11:41:49 +0200
- To: public-hydra@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACkJGAuJf4kV31Ab3tnXRBs-xOEj+NmLyKvfdOhsaVJSCH+AXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Markus and Jindřich, sorry for "double posting". It seems my first mail didn't arrived at my in-box and Jindřich answer also, but I read it in the public web archive. I hope from now everything works - I had trouble with w3c mailing lists before. > Does your use case really require it? I would say, yes. If you compare some GUI pagination patterns (see https://gist.github.com/mislav/622561) you can see that roughly 50% allow the user to jump to an arbitrary page. What do you think about Jindřich comment with the anonymous anonymous property? Some background: I'm mainly a frontend developer switching to the backend here and there. As we try to move more development processes to the client (for better iteration speeds, dynamic and fluid GUIs, etc.) we need a good interface between server and client. We really like the idea of Hypermedia APIs (instead of RPC-ish "REST" APIs) and I try to evaluate different solutions. We currently favor JSON Hyper-Schema directly embedded in our resources, but I would like to explore if we can move to Hydra/JSON-LD completely in the next turn as it seems to be a more widely used standard and because JSON-LD is supported by all major search engines. But I don't want to loose the benefits of JSON Hyper-Schema. Thanks, Pipo
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2014 09:42:18 UTC