RE: Call for consensus on collection design (ISSUE-41)

On 3 Jul 2014 at 17:58, Ruben Verborgh wrote:
> No concerns with the things that are defined;
> some open questions about the things that are not.
> 
> Most importantly, what is the thing that is the object of hydra:manages?
> Or, more strictly, what is its domain?
> How will it evolve in the future?
> 
> Those are things that can be dealt with later;
> I just wanted to bring them up as future TODOs.

Good point. We will raise separate issues for these things as soon as we
close ISSUE-41 - provided we adopt the proposed design.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Thursday, 3 July 2014 20:37:17 UTC