Re: W3C standardization process

Hi Markus, Hi James,

corporate customers are definitely easier to convince to use a standardized
technology.
But I agree that a stable version with appropriate tooling is the immediate
next step,

Cheers, Marcel

@FroehlichMarcel


2014/1/22 Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>

> Hi James,
>
> On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:20 PM, James Langley wrote:
> > Now that JSON-LD has been accepted as a W3C standard, are there
> > aspirations for Hydra to also become a W3C standard?
>
> Definitely!
>
> That being said, I consider it much less important for a vocabulary to be
> standardized by a standardization organization such as W3C than for a data
> format like JSON-LD. Just look at Schema.org (btw., there's a draft [1] of
> how an integration of a subset of Hydra into Schema.org could look like).
> The most important thing at the moment is, IMO, to finalize the design and
> build tooling around it.
>
>
> > If so, what rough timeframe do you anticipate this taking in?
> > 6-12 months, 2-5 years, 10 years?
>
> Standardization is typically very slow so I would say it is in the 2-5
> years
> timeframe.
>
>
> Just out of curiosity: is there something that stops you using Hydra if it
> isn't a W3C standard? Or was your question just driven by curiosity like
> mine? :-)
>
>
> Cheers,
> Markus
>
>
> [1] http://www.hydra-cg.com/spec/latest/schema.org/
>
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>