- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 16:28:32 +0100
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
- Cc: "'James Langley'" <jdhlangley@gmail.com>
Hi James, On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:20 PM, James Langley wrote: > Now that JSON-LD has been accepted as a W3C standard, are there > aspirations for Hydra to also become a W3C standard? Definitely! That being said, I consider it much less important for a vocabulary to be standardized by a standardization organization such as W3C than for a data format like JSON-LD. Just look at Schema.org (btw., there's a draft [1] of how an integration of a subset of Hydra into Schema.org could look like). The most important thing at the moment is, IMO, to finalize the design and build tooling around it. > If so, what rough timeframe do you anticipate this taking in? > 6-12 months, 2-5 years, 10 years? Standardization is typically very slow so I would say it is in the 2-5 years timeframe. Just out of curiosity: is there something that stops you using Hydra if it isn't a W3C standard? Or was your question just driven by curiosity like mine? :-) Cheers, Markus [1] http://www.hydra-cg.com/spec/latest/schema.org/ -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2014 15:29:02 UTC