- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:47:31 +0000
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: public-hydra@w3.org
> In this instance > for example, wouldn't it be more appropriate to use owl:equivalentClass > […] instead of rdfs:subClassOf? Probably not, as there is at least one more restriction: the fact that that domain needs to be hydra:Resource. > but I think we should also explain this stuff in simple prose. Sure. I think the entailment examples can help there. I.e., we showing a concrete example together with the extra knowledge that the ontology allows to derive. Best, Ruben
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2013 11:48:04 UTC