- From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 08:32:05 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
> [...] thus I see no point in explicitely saying that a sh:NodeShape and it's sh:property is used. You propose to simply replace `IriTemplateMapping` with `sh:PropertyShape`? > It won't matter whether the used IRI is an `owl:FunctionalProperty`, `sh:property` or raw `rdf:Property`. I'm confused. The `owl` and `rdf` terms are classes. `sh:property` is a property. I think you're misreading the snippet > I still see some benefits from using SHACL for cardinalities, but I think it is a way beyond this issue. And the cardinality is only because SHACL does not have a `required` constraint. Might keep `hydra:required`. Why not -- GitHub Notification of comment by tpluscode Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/214#issuecomment-633451063 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 25 May 2020 08:32:08 UTC