- From: Karol Szczepański via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 07:52:14 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
I was wondering whether there is any need to denote that a mapping can be a SHACL property - in RDF everything used as predicate is considered rdf:Property (correct me if I'm wrong), thus I see no point in explicitely saying that a `sh:NodeShape` and it's `sh:property` is used. It won't matter whether the used IRI is an `owl:FunctionalProperty`, `sh:property` or raw `rdf:Property`. I still see some benefits from using SHACL for cardinalities, but I think it is a way beyond this issue. -- GitHub Notification of comment by alien-mcl Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/214#issuecomment-633433603 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 25 May 2020 07:52:15 UTC