- From: Karol Szczepański via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 20:51:51 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
SHACL is tempting, but I don't think using it directly into hydra's spec constructs is a good approach. We've considered recommending SHACL to describe expected/returned data structures, but well ... it would be just a recommendation without imposing anything normative. Remember that while SHACL is a nice vocab that would fill the gap for non-RDF developers, RDF hardcore users would still stick to raw RDFS or OWL. -- GitHub Notification of comment by alien-mcl Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/pull/187#issuecomment-474579478 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2019 20:51:53 UTC