Re: [Specifications] Detailed specification for expects/returns and strongly typed collections (#187)

> I don't think using it directly into hydra's spec constructs is a good approach

How would you use it then?

> hardcore users would still stick to raw RDFS or OWL.

I don't think that's true. There is no sufficient tooling, especially in the browser to make OWL compelling even to "hardcore users"

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tpluscode
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/pull/187#issuecomment-474694111 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2019 05:50:09 UTC