- From: Markus Lanthaler via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2018 11:58:31 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 7 unresolved discussions. --- *[drafts/use-cases/2.3.complete-api-documentation.md, line 18 at r1](https://reviewable.io/reviews/hydracg/specifications/164#-LBHOjvS7YhwKTbeX2gc:-LDWSQeM77v6PAiTmfsZ:buz1jq0) ([raw file](https://github.com/hydracg/specifications/blob/c46a6c87fb68dce55656d41ee200d38e2cbf051d/drafts/use-cases/2.3.complete-api-documentation.md#L18)):* <details><summary><i>Previously, alien-mcl (Karol Szczepański) wrote…</i></summary><blockquote> Yes, should I retype it? </blockquote></details> Yeah, I think it would clarify it --- *[drafts/use-cases/2.3.complete-api-documentation.md, line 110 at r1](https://reviewable.io/reviews/hydracg/specifications/164#-LBHQ8pE-mjaNEKrmSAU:-LDWSdaL1xGCkEG-jJnx:bu36vhc) ([raw file](https://github.com/hydracg/specifications/blob/c46a6c87fb68dce55656d41ee200d38e2cbf051d/drafts/use-cases/2.3.complete-api-documentation.md#L110)):* <details><summary><i>Previously, alien-mcl (Karol Szczepański) wrote…</i></summary><blockquote> OK, but are there any alternatives? How to tell on API documentation level that there is an IRI template link? </blockquote></details> That's currently not possible --- *Comments from [Reviewable](https://reviewable.io/reviews/hydracg/specifications/164)* <!-- Sent from Reviewable.io --> -- GitHub Notification of comment by lanthaler Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/pull/164#issuecomment-392325800 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 27 May 2018 11:58:36 UTC