- From: Karol Szczepański via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 18:40:47 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 7 unresolved discussions. --- *[drafts/use-cases/2.3.complete-api-documentation.md, line 18 at r1](https://reviewable.io/reviews/hydracg/specifications/164#-LBHOjvS7YhwKTbeX2gc:-LCUpJLM45IObr3DADKl:bbzlskv) ([raw file](https://github.com/hydracg/specifications/blob/c46a6c87fb68dce55656d41ee200d38e2cbf051d/drafts/use-cases/2.3.complete-api-documentation.md#L18)):* <details><summary><i>Previously, lanthaler (Markus Lanthaler) wrote…</i></summary><blockquote> Do you mean parent/super-classes? </blockquote></details> Yes, should I retype it? --- *[drafts/use-cases/2.3.complete-api-documentation.md, line 110 at r1](https://reviewable.io/reviews/hydracg/specifications/164#-LBHQ8pE-mjaNEKrmSAU:-LCUpew62vEVddfrffv0:b-d0w3hj) ([raw file](https://github.com/hydracg/specifications/blob/c46a6c87fb68dce55656d41ee200d38e2cbf051d/drafts/use-cases/2.3.complete-api-documentation.md#L110)):* <details><summary><i>Previously, lanthaler (Markus Lanthaler) wrote…</i></summary><blockquote> `hydra:template` and `hydra:mapping` can't be used on the definition of a TemplatedLink. They need to be set when such a link is instantiated. </blockquote></details> OK, but are there any alternatives? How to tell on API documentation level that there is an IRI template link? --- *Comments from [Reviewable](https://reviewable.io/reviews/hydracg/specifications/164)* <!-- Sent from Reviewable.io --> -- GitHub Notification of comment by alien-mcl Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/pull/164#issuecomment-388920426 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 14 May 2018 18:40:50 UTC