- From: Markus Lanthaler via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 07:07:58 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
Review status: 4 of 5 files reviewed at latest revision, 9 unresolved discussions. --- *[drafts/use-cases/2.1.api-documentation-data-structures.md, line 1 at r1](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/hydracg/specifications/159#-L7TOIWl3Y1qaNywobmq:-L7YK3ETqc5cWy9GT-9y:b6ntv03) ([raw file](https://github.com/hydracg/specifications/blob/9ec1f3c4b27ee71e17c55325465f43f85e77ffe3/drafts/use-cases/2.1.api-documentation-data-structures.md#L1)):* <details><summary><i>Previously, alien-mcl (Karol Szczepański) wrote…</i></summary><blockquote> Done. </blockquote></details> Looks like you forgot to push your changes. --- *[drafts/use-cases/2.1.api-documentation-data-structures.md, line 44 at r1](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/hydracg/specifications/159#-L7TP-83BXSVMKMmo54r:-L7YK97YzBiiWHJcw1Lo:bw5no1p) ([raw file](https://github.com/hydracg/specifications/blob/9ec1f3c4b27ee71e17c55325465f43f85e77ffe3/drafts/use-cases/2.1.api-documentation-data-structures.md#L44)):* <details><summary><i>Previously, alien-mcl (Karol Szczepański) wrote…</i></summary><blockquote> Hmm. Actually I didn't want the documentation to be confused with an actual API resource as other (`/api/event` to not to look to far) are addressed same way. Do we have another option? </blockquote></details> What about `/api-documentation` then? It is an actual API resource btw. ;-) A crucial part of its interface --- *Comments from [Reviewable](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/hydracg/specifications/159)* <!-- Sent from Reviewable.io --> -- GitHub Notification of comment by lanthaler Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/pull/159#issuecomment-372924824 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2018 07:08:05 UTC