- From: Asbjørn Ulsberg via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:39:05 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
> I introduced `**action**` and `**request**`. I'm quite unhappy with the name of the latter but couldn't come up with something better yet (handler might work but I didn't like it too much either). If I understand the object within `request` correctly, I agree that `request` isn't the best name. What about `form` or `recipe`? --- Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 3 unresolved discussions. --- *Comments from [Reviewable](https://reviewable.io:443/reviews/hydracg/specifications/154#-:-L3SdTXlNgB2lr35gUjn:b428b9g)* <!-- Sent from Reviewable.io --> -- GitHub Notification of comment by asbjornu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/pull/154#issuecomment-359399010 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 22 January 2018 11:39:07 UTC