Re: Jan 8: Reps for Digital Civilization

Namaste

I agree to the pointer made for  <  a web that serves people—not platforms.>
 This calls for Human Language- Neutral Technology and Web - Programming.
That is a foundational thinking on the relation between way Human language
diversity is locked in ' One Socio-Historical- Technology and Standards
framework, ruled by corporate combines. The challenge is cognized by people
with vision and sensitivity in articulate expressions, like: Raise of
Anglomania in Technology, Needs for Non Roman script Initiatives in Digital
world, Humanized Web ( to realize the intent of expression: World- Wide-
Web). Voice web, Semantic web and the like. Some have explored lines of
Open Software, Free Software, Open Systems and the like.

With my limited understanding of -Rep- design basics, to achieve human
centric- personhood anchor for A.I intruded Web - needs a deep look in to
techno- legal- global protections needed to program and regulate World Wide
Web, which is hanging on ' Human Language - Technology- Relations.
The two ends of this debate extends between Global Society - Security to
indidual ethical spirituality: In both cases Language- Semiotics playing a
key role.

Chomsky opened a peep door to see light beyond cave. Now someone- and that
means we the first line with concern need to find ways to jail- breakout
from the Tech- cave binding human language.

In my classical terminology, the Samskruth term for this is: Moksha:
liberation, freedom from slavery and suffering.
Regards

BVK Sastry


On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, 6:25 am Timothy Holborn, <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I am strongly of the view, that the term 'personhood', has historically
> had the definition of defining how an entity - natural or otherwise - has
> agency, in relation to law and society.
>
> for example - a person who is not of sound mind, lacks the ability to be
> properly heard in a court of law, and therefore requires support by another
> which therefore is a limitation to their personhood - similarly also,
> children - guardianships.
>
> in some jurisdictions, it was decided that companies should have their own
> independent personhood - corporate personhood - as is illustrated by
> chomsky in various places, and, i've seen work on seeking to provide
> software personhood, whether it be DAOs or AI or whatever - i'm not sure
> anyone really knows - seems the objective is to just, let the robots kill
> people and make them legally responsible.
>
> so - whilst i accept the direction sought to be taken by the group, as a
> determination of the group, the work i've seen on redefining personhood
> -in all too many ways - i think, well, worry.
>
> that the trend may well continue.  lets ensure they're known to all
> impacted.  as is an important part of their personhood.  i don't think that
> happened enough, re: covid.  or, perhaps not yet.
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 at 18:17, Michael Robbins <
> michael@learningpathmakers.org> wrote:
>
>> *Human-Centric AI Pathmakers*,
>>
>> Join the next meeting of the *W3C Human-Centric AI Community Group* as
>> we explore how *AI-powered digital representatives (Reps)* will enable
>> personhood in the real-world metaverse and shape the future of the web.
>>
>> 🗓 Date: January 8
>> ⏰ Time: 11:00 AM – 12:00 PM ET
>>
>> Chart the trajectory for collaboratives of Reps to transform digital
>> representation and data dignity, laying the foundation for a web that
>> serves people—not platforms.
>>
>> *Register Now
>> <https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZMudeqqrTMuE9xYZstcOWXuGNVZiG-Emf9d>* to
>> join this forward-thinking conversation.
>> *Our only hope against AI out of control is with AI that we inhabit.*
>>
>> Onward!
>> 🌄 Michael Robbins
>> Chair, W3C Human-Centric AI Community Group
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/mwrxyz/
>>
>