Minutes Re: Agenda: HTML meeting on Tuesday 22nd May

Online at https://www.w3.org/2018/05/22-html-minutes.html and below for  
convenience (they are short):


                               HTML meeting

22 May 2018

Attendees

    Present
           Sangwhan, Terence, Chaals, Scott, Léonie

    Regrets
           Bruce, Xiaoqian

    Chair
           Léonie

    Scribe
           Léonie, chaals

Contents

      * Topics
          1. Implementation report
          2. Wide review
          3. Face to face agenda
      No Action Items nor Resolutions
      __________________________________________________________

Implementation report

    LW: Thanks to Terence and Scott for completing.
    ... Sangwhan?

    TE: Nothing from Sangwhan yet.

    SOH: My name is next to one but it links to the wrong issue.

    LW: Need to look in the changelog.

    TE: It's wrong in the changelog.

    LW: Scott, can you fix the changelog, then update the
    implementation report?

    TE: Just updating the implementation report now.

Wide review

    LJW: Chaals talked to privacy folks, hope for some review, i18n
    mostly happy but looking at the ruby issues (they don't want to
    lose bits), waiting on security review may take a bit past the
    deadline so we could work on implementation report and more
    editorial updates.

    SW: TAG - probably won't address anything in the 5.3 review,
    but we are trying to get to HTML as a whole. Which is a big
    long job - at least half a year is our schedule.
    ... Will also look at things that we would like to remove, so
    some issues will come up with interop. But don't hold your
    breath. So no formal 5.3 review - on a quick look there wasn't
    much to be concerned about in terms of delta from 5.2. I'll
    bring it up in teh TAG call if you like

    LJW: A response saying "nothing from the TAG" would be helpful.

    SW: OK. Note that the TAG likes to review small features rather
    than a whole spec.

Face to face agenda

    LJW: On the agenda we should expect something on what the path
    is for 5.3 and onward...
    ... any other concrete suggestions?

    SW: Would like to look at things that haven't been looked at
    for a long time.

    CMN: Removing things like ISMAP

    LJW: Discussion of TAGs overall review sounds good.

    <sangwhan> TAG HTML reviews:
    <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues?utf8=✓&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+html+general++review>


    SW: If you have anything around images/media/forms/ruby, ping
    me

    LJW: Are there criteria you are using that we can see?

    SW: Goal is to look at the architecture and see if there are
    improvements to make in APIs, in interop, or where we could
    streamline the platform. E.g. some stuff in forms is not very
    good - you cannot style them so people do weird other stuff
    which is not helpful.

    [10]github repo where the HTML 5.3 implementation report
    lives: https://github.com/w3c/test-results

    [adjourn]




-- 
Chaals: Charles (McCathie) Nevile    find more at https://yandex.com
Using Opera's long-abandoned mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Is there really still nothing better?

Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2018 14:12:23 UTC