W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2018

Re: Request SVG review of HTML5.3

From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 20:12:05 +0100
To: Bogdan Brinza <bbrinza@microsoft.com>
Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1abe3079-9957-d044-ad0b-0c0941b10f01@tink.uk>

On 08/06/2018 22:55, Bogdan Brinza wrote:
> Hi Leonie,
> 
> Thank you for reaching out. We couldn't make the deadline, but on the most recent call had a chance to discuss this: https://www.w3.org/2018/06/04-svg-minutes.html#item02
No problem, thank you for finding the time. As it turns out, we've 
decided to push out our timetable in any case.

> 
> We'd still like to capture our feedback.
> 
> Currently SVG 2.0 Editor's Draft takes reference to HTML Living Standard - https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/refs.html#NormativeReferences and that is a requirement for us we have a dependency on the few recent changes made in that version (mixins), informed by the web browsers interoperability today.
> 
> Per our call minutes we won't be able to change that dependency as we really need those changes to reflect the state of the web.
> 

We have an open PR to add the mixins to HTML5.3:
https://github.com/w3c/html/pull/1489

It's part of an effort to identify and minimise technical deltas between 
the HTML5.3 specification and the HTML standard. Review from someone in 
the SVG WG would be welcome - perhaps Amelia as she filed the original 
issue?

Thanks again for your help.
Léonie.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 9:52
> To: www-svg@w3.org
> Cc: public-html@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Request SVG review of HTML5.3
> 
> 
> On 26/04/2018 15:11, Léonie Watson wrote:
>> Hello SVG,
> Hello again.
> 
>>
>> We would welcome your review of HTML5.3 [1].
>>
>> To help make your review easier, we have produced a changelog that
>> contains all substantive changes made since HTML5.2 [2]. Please also
>> note that there are features marked "at risk", documented in the Status.
>> If there are any issues arising from your review, please file them on
>> the HTML Github repo [3], and apply the "wide review" and "svg" labels
>> to each issue. This will help us track your issues and ensure we
>> respond accordingly.
>>
>> We would appreciate your feedback no later than Friday 25th May 2018.
>> Thank you.
> 
> This is a final follow-up to confirm that the SVG WG is happy for
> HTML5.3 to progress to CR without review?
> 
> In the tradition of the W3C, we'd prefer a concrete response, but in the absence of a response by end of day on Friday 1st June, we'll assume that the SVG WG is indeed happy for us to begin the journey to CR.
> 
>>
>> Léonie on behalf of the HTML Editors and WebPlat Chairs.
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/html53/
>> [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/html53/changes.html#changes
>> [3]  https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/new/
>>
> 
> --
> @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe Carpe diem
> 

-- 
@LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe Carpe diem
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2018 19:13:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 23 June 2018 19:13:04 UTC