- From: Joshua Bell <jsbell@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 12:16:04 -0700
- To: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
- Cc: adanilo@chromium.org, public-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAD649j5bEBDqwe6rsv1HkSD=YawfhzsrVRZn9VfQVD2N_aKVfw@mail.gmail.com>
We could also question whether it's necessary to push on this with any urgency. In the current state, Indexed DB https://w3c.github.io/IndexedDB/ has normative references to HTML https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/ and DOM https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/ (and Infra https://infra.spec.whatwg.org/ apparently - yay Bikeshed!): https://w3c.github.io/IndexedDB/#index-defined-elsewhere I filed the relevant issue with the intent that having https://w3c.github.io/html/ and https://w3c.github.io/dom/ include the same content would seemingly be ideal (W3C having normative dependencies on other W3C where possible), but Indexed DB is not inconsistent due to the absence. I don't want to push unnecessary work on others, or delay other work. (As an aside, I note that https://w3c.github.io/dom/#index-defined-elsewhere lists normative dependencies on https://dom.spec.whatwg.org - but that may be a tooling issue rather than intent) On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote: > On 06/07/2017 12:14, Alex Danilo wrote: > >> I've done a bunch of work today to get this into shape. There is zero >> chance this can be finished this week. >> > > Thanks Alex. > > >> I'm going to continue tomorrow and will try to find some time over the >> weekend as well but there is a lot to do. >> > > Understood, and again, thanks for putting in the time on this. > > >> Will update on Monday, in the meantime it would be good to get some >> confirmation on your time-line for Rec to see if it matches up to what fits >> in for this year. >> > > Have pinged Chaals for confirmation. There may be places we can trim it, > but I'll leave it to him to confirm/deny. > > > >> Thanks, >> Alex >> P.S. Unless Josh wants to produce a mega-PR :-) >> > Josh, if there is anything you can do to help Alex with this, it really > would be appreciated. Thanks. > > >> On 5 July 2017 at 18:54, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk <mailto:tink@tink.uk>> >> wrote: >> >> Thanks Alex. Appreciate anything you can do. >> >> >> >> On 05/07/2017 07:24, Alex Danilo wrote: >> >> Hi Léonie, >> >> This change is pretty substantial. I'll have to offload some >> high priority work to spend extra time on this. >> >> Right now, I can't estimate how long it will take so will send >> an update at the end of tomorrow my time which should let me get >> a better grasp of the timing. >> >> As for Josh, the US has a holiday and I doubt he'll have time to >> review, we'll need to defer to one of the other editors to do >> that. >> >> Alex >> >> On 5 July 2017 at 01:27, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk >> <mailto:tink@tink.uk> <mailto:tink@tink.uk >> >> <mailto:tink@tink.uk>>> wrote: >> >> Alex & Josh, >> >> The original HTML5.2 timeline [1] is about a month out at >> present. >> If we can get issue #829 resolved this week, we should just >> about be >> able to get 5.2 to Rec before we run into the Christmas >> holidays. >> Much more than a week longer, and we'll be looking at >> January (and a >> knock on for HTML5.3 etc.). >> >> We really don't want HTML5.2 to move forward without this >> issue >> being resolved. IndexedDB has a dependency on it, and it'd >> be good >> to move that forward to Rec too, but we need to keep moving >> on HTML. >> >> Questions... >> >> 1. Can you get this issue resolved and merged by the end of >> this week? >> 2. If not, what is a realistic timetable? >> >> If this issue is resolved by the end of this week, our >> timeline will >> go something like this (Chaals will correct it if my >> back/packet >> calculations are awry): >> >> Mon 10th Jul: open CFC for CR. >> Tue 25th Jul: publish CR (triggers AC review). >> Mon 9th Oct: open CFC for PR. >> Tue 24th Oct: publish PR. >> Wed 22nd Nov: AC review ends. >> Thu 7th Dec: publish Rec. >> >> Léonie. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [1] >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2016Nov/001 >> 4.html >> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2016Nov/ >> 0014.html> >> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives >> /Public/public-html/2016Nov/0014.html >> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2016Nov/ >> 0014.html>> >> >> -- @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk >> <http://tink.uk> <http://tink.uk> Carpe diem >> >> >> >> -- @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk <http://tink.uk> Carpe >> diem >> >> >> > -- > @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk Carpe diem >
Received on Thursday, 6 July 2017 19:16:37 UTC