- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:48:44 +1000
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: "tink@tink.uk" <tink@tink.uk>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
I was under the impression that extension specifications make it into the HTML spec when implementations are available. Is the inert attribute implemented in browsers? Cheers, Silvia. On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Léonie Watson wrote: >> Our charter encourages us to use extensions … But we have to balance this with the practicality of an extension specification > > I’m sure there are good reasons to push for extensions, but for a single attribute that doesn’t appear to conflict with other things it seems like overkill. > > Unless someone can provide a good reason to keep it separate (beyond an ideological one) I’d suggest just incorporating it. > > Kind regards, > > -Alastair > > -- > > www.nomensa.com / @alastc > > >
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2017 10:49:38 UTC