- From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 08:46:54 +0100
- To: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
Brief reminder that this CFC closes tomorrow, and that you can respond by email or Github (per the details below). Thanks. Léonie. -- @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem On 02/09/2016 13:38, Léonie Watson wrote: > Hello WebPlat, > > With thanks to everyone who contributed, and to the HTML editors in > particular, this is a Call For Consensus (CFC) to request W3C publish > the HTML5.1 Editor's Draft (ED) [1] as a PR. > > Please note, this CFC is being sent to public-webapps@w3.org as the > official email list noted in the WebPlat charter. > > Please respond by end of day on Friday 9th September 2016. Responses > maybe given in reply to this email, or on Github [2]. Positive responses > are preferred and encouraged, but silence will be taken as consent to > the proposal. > > Following Candidate Recommendation (CR), several "at risk" features were > removed, whilst others were retained. Details can be found in the status > section of the ED. > > The HTML5.1 Implementation report [3] references three features with no > known native implementations, and three features with one known > implementation. In each case the W3C specification aligns with the > WHATWG specification. > > Of the features with one iplementation, we expect that there will be > more implementations in the future. Of those with no implementations: > > 1. the algorithm steps to support CSP have no impact unless the relevant > parts of CSP *are* supported, in which case they specify the expected > interoperable > behaviour. The chairs expect such CSP support to occur relatively soon. > If it appears that this will not be implemented in the future, this > change is likely > to be reverted in HTML 5.2. > > 2. the algorithm steps to support closing a blob with the FileAPI's > close() method likewise have no impact unless the method is supported. > Since the future > of that method is under discussion, this part of the relevant algorithm > will be a candidate for removal from HTML 5.2. > > 3. probablySupportsContext is a convenience function to enhance > performance when using canvas. If this does not seem likely to be > implemented, it will be > a candidate for removal from HTML 5.2 > > The WebPlat chairs recommend supporting this proposal. Although it is > not perfect, it represents a substantial improvement over the HTML5 > Recommendation, so publishing it would be helpful. Rather than hold up > the publication of these improvements, we can continue to improve and > iterate the HTML specification as HTML5.2. > > > Léonie on behalf of the WebPlat chairs and team > [1] https://www.w3.org/WebPlatform/docs/html51-20160902/ > [2] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/578 > [3] http://w3c.github.io/test-results/html51/implementation-report.html > >
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2016 07:47:24 UTC