- From: Ian Yang <ian.html@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 16:50:48 +0800
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2016 08:51:21 UTC
2016-11-24 16:34 GMT+08:00 Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>: > Hi Ian, while the design pattern you describe may make more sense, it is > often not practical or possible to change the behaviour of implemented > features. The reasoning for not pursuing the case you describe here, was > explained to you over on the WHATWG issue > <https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2076> > > Having reviewed the issue, I agree with the response provided there by > Domenic Denicola > > -- > > Regards > > SteveF > Current Standards Work @W3C > <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/> > Personally, I think Domenic's reason is flawed, too. An arguably flawed feature in HTML is widely used so we should not deprecate it and improve HTML? I don't understand that logic. Regards, Ian
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2016 08:51:21 UTC