- From: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 10:24:33 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
On Wed, 25 May 2016 01:48:09 +0100, Michiel Bijl <michiel@agosto.nl> wrote: > 1. I never come across them. > > 2. No. > > 3. Regardless of my answer to 2: I think it makes sense to add the > focusable areas in the image maps as many times as they are applied to > images. If I link to the same page four times on a single page, I > wouldn’t only want to focus one of those links. Does that make sense? To you, obviously. To me too - and I have come across this, although rarely. One consideration is if this isn't a real-world issue, we're unlikely to find people willing to prioritise it for implementation. Which may make the question moot. cheers > —Michiel > >> On 24 May 2016, at 15:06, Chaals McCathie Nevile >> <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> I presume that image maps are something people don't find often - but >> there are a number of things about them that are unclear. >> >> 1. Do you meet them anywhere on the web today? >> >> 2. Do you know of cases where one image map is applied to two images - >> e.g. one at the top and another at the bottom of a page? >> >> 3. If the answer to 2 is yes, do you care whether you go through them >> twice, i.e. each time you meet the image, or once, where the actual >> `map` is in the HTML source? This probably only applies to those who >> navigate with the keyboard. >> >> See also HTML issue https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/297 >> >> -- >> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex >> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com >> > -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2016 08:25:15 UTC