W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2015

Re: nav > ul is sometimes redundant

From: Matt Di Pasquale <liveloveprosper@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 11:02:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CADCE91SSif6NzzKSJyaOC=xx-VsyatLjnMjo39zgSnC+ByyWFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marat Tanalin <mtanalin@yandex.ru>
Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Patrick, yes, I was suggesting adding it to HTML5.

Marat, that works too. I also that of that.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Marat Tanalin <mtanalin@yandex.ru> wrote:

> 03.09.2015, 16:53, "Matt Di Pasquale" <liveloveprosper@gmail.com>:
> > <nav>
> >   <ul>
> >     <li><a href="/">Home</a></li>
> >     <li><a href="/about">About</a></li>
> >     <li><a href="/contact">Contact</a></li>
> >   </ul>
> > </nav>
> >
> > Why do I need the extra nav element? Wouldn't it be simpler if I could
> remove the nav element and perhaps replace the ul element with an nl
> element?
>
> Instead of inventing another navigation-semantics element like `NL`, it
> would probably be more reasonable to be able to omit nested `UL` and put
> `LI` items directly inside `NAV`.
>
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2015 15:03:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:46:16 UTC