- From: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 18:07:32 +0000
- To: "lwatson@paciellogroup.com" <lwatson@paciellogroup.com>, "info@3zero.co.uk" <info@3zero.co.uk>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
So, then why have it at all? Shouldn't be expose the role when it exists? -----Original Message----- From: Léonie Watson [mailto:lwatson@paciellogroup.com] Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 1:30 AM To: info@3zero.co.uk; public-html@w3.org Subject: RE: Headers Are Confusing in HTML5 > From: info@3zero.co.uk [mailto:info@3zero.co.uk] > Sent: 27 November 2015 01:34 > As a developer I find the current advice for Headers somewhat > confusing. I understand each area of the page can now have headers but > is that good for semantics? Surely a document only needs one set of > headers contained within the main article content of the page. To have > headers in all sections > would that not prove more problematic for screen readers? I am totally > baffled as to how to correctly markup a webpage now where as before I > would use headers to summarise the main content of the page. Your > advice would be gratefully received. The browser should only expose the <header> (or <footer>) when it is scoped to <body> [1]. If it is a child of <section>, <article>, or another sectioning element, the role should not be exposed and screen readers should therefore be unaware of it. So <header> is useful to screen reader users as part of the high-level document structure and ignored otherwise. It is therefore ok to continue using <header> elsewhere in your document as you usually would. Léonie. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html-aam-1.0/ -- Senior accessibility engineer @LeonieWatson @PacielloGroup
Received on Monday, 30 November 2015 18:08:01 UTC