- From: Jason Kiss <jason@accessibleculture.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 16:24:46 +1200
- To: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
- Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Alice Boxhall <aboxhall@google.com>
Some history on that note: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16769 Could be that Chrome has since dropped the BSTR hack. Would need to test. A quick look shows that a blockquote element still gets exposed by Chrome with MSAA accrole of "blockquote", although the q element doesn't seem to get exposed similarly with "q". My quick look might have been too quick, though. On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com> wrote: > Afaik some of it is used by commercial screen readers, it's not webby but > I'm not sure whether any of them wanted to share extra info on this. > > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Is this note an accurate refelction of implementaions? mentions chrome, >> can't find examples where chrome does this, only firefox. >> >> http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/html-aam/html-aam.html#use-of-msaa-variant-by-some-user-agents >> >> Also any info on which AT make use of this info? >> -- >> >> Regards >> >> SteveF >> HTML 5.1 > >
Received on Thursday, 28 May 2015 04:25:45 UTC