- From: Martin Janecke <w3.org@prlbr.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 16:12:00 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org, Leo Wilson <LWilson@xlww.net>
On 20.05.15 01:07, Leo Wilson wrote: > I think you should in you next recommendation you > should include a </*> element that would close all elements except > for head, body, and html elements. This would help, Leo, in which situation would that help? Why would, say, <b> </*> be better than <b> </b>? Or do you mean that it would save authors time because they can quickly close open elements without checking what the open elements are? But if they don't check, how do they know they want to close these elements at that point? > and would also > encourage proper syntax with the closing of elements, one thing that > HTML 5 doesnt absolutely require to operate without errors. I'm not sure I understand this. How would it encourage proper closing? I suspect that a new wildcard closing tag would rather encourage people to stop using the most proper, readable tag that uses the same name as the element's opening tag. An example may help to illustrate your idea. Can you please provide one? Thanks, Martin
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2015 14:12:31 UTC