- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:38:51 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
On 27/02/2015 14:34 , Sam Ruby wrote: > On 2/24/15 7:51 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: >> • We dropped support for splitting the spec. Only a single-page >> version is now produced. > > Why was this done? With the previous pipeline, splitting was one of the more common causes of breakage. I wanted to experiment without. Also, as nice as (clearly) it is for some users, it's orthogonal to the hard part which is to produce the content. > Is there a technical reason that there couldn't be a node.js script that > took the output of spork and produced a split spec? None. > If there were documentation on how to set up and run spork, next week I > could take a stab at writing the code that split the spec. I can offer better. Not only is there now some documentation (though it can still be improved), I have also, by popular demand, implemented splitting :) -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Wednesday, 4 March 2015 14:38:56 UTC