RE: Proposal to change documentation on tabindex to strongly discourage values greater 0

+1 for me as well :)

From: Cynthia Shelly [mailto:cyns@microsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 9:00 AM
To: chaals@yandex-team.ru; White, Jason J; Janina Sajka
Cc: Joseph Scheuhammer; Marco Zehe; public-html@w3.org; W3C WAI Protocols & Formats
Subject: RE: Proposal to change documentation on tabindex to strongly discourage values greater 0

I like the idea of this new structure.  I think we should start work on that AND do what the original mail suggested, to change the docs to discourage tabindex >1 in the short term. I would also like to deprecate tabindex values >1, but that might need to wait until this new thing is more developed.

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: chaals@yandex-team.ru<mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Sent: ‎10/‎20/‎2014 7:40 AM
To: White, Jason J<mailto:jjwhite@ets.org>; Janina Sajka<mailto:janina@rednote.net>
Cc: Joseph Scheuhammer<mailto:clown@alum.mit.edu>; Marco Zehe<mailto:mzehe@mozilla.com>; public-html@w3.org<mailto:public-html@w3.org>; W3C WAI Protocols & Formats<mailto:public-pfwg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal to change documentation on tabindex to strongly  discourage  values greater 0


20.10.2014, 15:55, "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org<mailto:jjwhite@ets.org>>:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Janina Sajka [mailto:janina@rednote.net]
>> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 9:31 AM
>> A feature such as Charles describes is useful, and has already been
>> defined for DAISY (ANSI/NISO Z39.86).
>>
>> An important additional requirement is a reliable way to escape out of
>> the local mode--either forward beyond the structure, or back to
>> something before it. It must be easy to "go local" or "stay global."
>
> In general, I agree. However, I understood the scope of Charles' proposal to be limited to locally influencing the navigation sequence when it reaches a given subtree, not encompassing anything that would potentially trap the user in a navigation cycle comprising part of a document.

Yep. I suspect we are on the same page.

And to return to Marco's original proposal, I think we would do well not to call this thing tabindex, unless there is some sensible way of makin olduses of the markup do new and more useful tricks.

But here, I'm not sure how to dothat without making existing things worse.

cheers

> Clarification would of course be welcome.
>
> ________________________________
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
>
> ________________________________

--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru<mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru> - - - Find more at http://yandex.com