- From: Brendan Long <self@brendanlong.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 18:18:09 -0500
- To: public-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <537E85B1.30503@brendanlong.com>
I've proposed this in the past, but I think I've narrowed it down to specific changes, and I'm wondering if other people think this would be a useful way to allow rewriting of cues. *Why* In streaming text tracks, we need a way to fix incorrect cues. Some examples: * In live TV, people type the captions in by hand <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_captioning#Television_and_video> shortly before you see them. If they make a mistake, we need a way to fix it. * CEA-608 and CEA-708 captions don't start with a convenient startTime --> endTime block like WebVTT does. A caption ends when we get a command that makes it stop displaying. If we want to transcode to WebVTT in real-time, we have to either wait until the caption is over to translate it (delaying the stream by some arbitary time in the hope that it will be long enough), or we need to start a caption immediately with a guess of the end time and then rewrite it once we know the correct end time (or rewrite it to extend the end time until we find the correct one). *How* The solution I'm proposing is that if we see two cues with the same id, the earlier cue will be removed. some-id 00:00:00 --> 00:00:30 This is an xeample some-id 00:00:00 --> 00:00:10 This is an example In this example, the text "This is an example" will be displayed for 10 seconds starting at time 0. *Why This Solution* This solution is nice because the syntax is simple and easy to understand, and it's powerful enough to rewrite any cue in any way you could possibly want, because the new cue completely replaces the old one. *Arguments against* This isn't particularly efficient. If you just want to change the time, you need to send the entire updated cue, instead of just the change. I don't think this is a big deal, because even the most heavily edited subtitle file will be orders of magnitude smaller than the accompanying video. *Specifically..* There are a couple ways of doing this in HTML: 1. Do this at the WebVTT-layer: If the WebVTT parser sees a cue with the same id as an older cue, it explicitly removes the older cue from the track and then adds the new cue. 2. Do this at the HTML layer: If any TextTrack gets a cue with the same id as a cue it already has, it removes the old cue before adding the new one. I think doing this at the HTML layer makes sense, because: * ids should be unique anyway. That's why they're ids. * TextTrack.getCueById() doesn't make sense if ids aren't unique. * The implementation is much easier if we can throw a hash table in TextTrack and use it for detecting duplicate ids, and for making getCueById() fast. * Handling weird edge cases is simpler: o If JavaScript adds a cue with the same id as an existing cue, the existing cue is removed. o If the UA adds a cue with the same id as a cue added by JavaScript, the cue added by JavaScript is removed (in this case, presumably whatever trigger caused JavaScript to add that cue will be triggered again). I think if we do this, it should *also* be added to the WebVTT spec, so files that do this will render properly in non-HTML media players. *More specifically**...* https://github.com/w3c/html/pull/20 *Conclusion* Does this seem like a reasonable change to you? --------------090908040101020106080809 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> I've proposed this in the past, but I think I've narrowed it down to specific changes, and I'm wondering if other people think this would be a useful way to allow rewriting of cues.<br> <br> <b>Why</b><br> <br> In streaming text tracks, we need a way to fix incorrect cues. Some examples:<br> <ul> <li>In live TV, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_captioning#Television_and_video">people type the captions in by hand</a> shortly before you see them. If they make a mistake, we need a way to fix it.</li> <li>CEA-608 and CEA-708 captions don't start with a convenient startTime --> endTime block like WebVTT does. A caption ends when we get a command that makes it stop displaying. If we want to transcode to WebVTT in real-time, we have to either wait until the caption is over to translate it (delaying the stream by some arbitary time in the hope that it will be long enough), or we need to start a caption immediately with a guess of the end time and then rewrite it once we know the correct end time (or rewrite it to extend the end time until we find the correct one).</li> </ul> <p><b>How</b><br> </p> <p>The solution I'm proposing is that if we see two cues with the same id, the earlier cue will be removed.<br> </p> <blockquote> <p>some-id<br> 00:00:00 --> 00:00:30<br> This is an xeample<br> </p> <p>some-id<br> 00:00:00 --> 00:00:10<br> This is an example<br> </p> </blockquote> <p>In this example, the text "This is an example" will be displayed for 10 seconds starting at time 0.<br> </p> <p><b>Why This Solution</b><br> </p> <p>This solution is nice because the syntax is simple and easy to understand, and it's powerful enough to rewrite any cue in any way you could possibly want, because the new cue completely replaces the old one.<br> </p> <p><b>Arguments against</b><br> </p> <p>This isn't particularly efficient. If you just want to change the time, you need to send the entire updated cue, instead of just the change.<br> </p> <p>I don't think this is a big deal, because even the most heavily edited subtitle file will be orders of magnitude smaller than the accompanying video.<br> </p> <p><b>Specifically..</b><br> </p> <p>There are a couple ways of doing this in HTML:<br> </p> <ol> <li>Do this at the WebVTT-layer: If the WebVTT parser sees a cue with the same id as an older cue, it explicitly removes the older cue from the track and then adds the new cue.</li> <li>Do this at the HTML layer: If any TextTrack gets a cue with the same id as a cue it already has, it removes the old cue before adding the new one.</li> </ol> <p>I think doing this at the HTML layer makes sense, because:<br> </p> <ul> <li>ids should be unique anyway. That's why they're ids.</li> <li>TextTrack.getCueById() doesn't make sense if ids aren't unique.</li> <li>The implementation is much easier if we can throw a hash table in TextTrack and use it for detecting duplicate ids, and for making getCueById() fast.</li> <li>Handling weird edge cases is simpler:</li> <ul> <li>If JavaScript adds a cue with the same id as an existing cue, the existing cue is removed.</li> <li>If the UA adds a cue with the same id as a cue added by JavaScript, the cue added by JavaScript is removed (in this case, presumably whatever trigger caused JavaScript to add that cue will be triggered again).</li> </ul> </ul> <p>I think if we do this, it should *also* be added to the WebVTT spec, so files that do this will render properly in non-HTML media players.<br> </p> <p><b>More specifically</b><b>...</b><br> </p> <p><a href="https://github.com/w3c/html/pull/20">https://github.com/w3c/html/pull/20</a><br> </p> <p><b>Conclusion</b><br> </p> <p>Does this seem like a reasonable change to you?<br> </p> <p><br> </p> </body> </html> --------------090908040101020106080809--
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2014 23:18:43 UTC