Re: [IDEA] HTML next, 6, 7, What ever

Hey Steve,

I looked into it (and maybe I missed something) and it looks like it
involves a JS script or just a script in general. The idea was to get away
from complicated scripts for something that should be as easy as I
demonstrated.

-Bill


On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Bill,
>
> have a look at web components: http://webcomponents.org/ there you will
> find <template> etc
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards
>
> SteveF
> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
>
>
> On 10 June 2014 21:46, William De Luca <delucaw@frequentflyerservices.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey HTML wizards,
>>
>> I had an idea for the next HTML version and I found this address.. Not
>> sure if it is the right one, but I figured I would give it a try.
>>
>> Smart HTML
>>
>> There are a lot of simple tasks that PHP and JQuery/Javascript do on a
>> regular bases, but why? These are such simple things that there is no
>> reason for a Server OR JS to do them. For instance: The template tag
>> <template> is used for Javascript to replicate bits of code. Why cant the
>> browser do that with out JS? its a rather simple request. How about using
>> like this:
>>
>> <head>
>> <template id='something1'>HTML STUFF HERE<insert/>MORE HTML</template>
>> </head>
>>
>> <body>
>> <something1>put this in the template</something1>
>> </body>
>>
>> This would take a lot off the backs of PHP and JS. You could also have
>> multiple inserts and it would just use a delimited list between the tags.
>> To prevent error it will only insert per insert tag so if you have more
>> items in your delimited list it will just stop when it reaches the last
>> insert tag.
>>
>> Here is another one INCLUDES! We use php and JS to include bits of code
>> from other files all the time. Why cant the Browser go out and grab the
>> additional html code and plop it in?
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> <include src='menu.html' />
>>
>> Why resort in 2014 to other languages for such a simple task?
>>
>> Thanks for reading, I hope I was not a bother,
>> -Bill
>>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2014 15:58:42 UTC