- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 17:12:28 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, public-html@w3.org
Ok, hopefully up to date now. The results themselves were fine, just the summary wasn't up to date. I fixed that and added some more results too. Thanks to James for pointing out that the .headers files for those tests had not been put in github, which would explain the unexpected results in Robin's doc. I will submit them (as soon as I have time to remind myself how to grapple with github). RI On 06/06/2014 15:46, Richard Ishida wrote: > Actually my results page seems to be out of date in some places. I'm > fixing it now. However, I'm pretty sure that at least one browser > recognises language settings in the HTTP header. > > RI > > > On 06/06/2014 15:34, Richard Ishida wrote: >> I clicked on the following test: >> >> /html/dom/elements/global-attributes/the-lang-attribute-001.html >> >> "The browser will recognize a language declared in the HTTP header, when >> there is no internal language declaration." >> >> And it shows fails across the board. This doesn't tally with the >> results I have for the same test: >> >> http://www.w3.org/International/tests/repository/html5/the-lang-attribute/results-lang#basics >> >> >> >> Is something broken wrt the http settings for that test? >> >> (Those results will affect a few other language related tests.) >> >> RI >> >> >> On 04/06/2014 17:22, Robin Berjon wrote: >>> On 04/06/2014 18:08 , Boris Zbarsky wrote: >>>> On 6/4/14, 11:38 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: >>>>> just a heads up that we have been running the test suite against >>>>> implementations and have been gathering updated results for the HTML >>>>> CR. >>>>> They are not final yet, and will get updated, but the current >>>>> status is >>>>> documented here: >>>>> >>>>> http://w3c.github.io/test-results/html/less-than-2.html >>>> >>>> I'd be pretty interested in seeing the full result set, or even better >>>> the sets of tests that particular UAs fail. We need two interoperable >>>> implementations to exit CR, but we also want our tests to actually be >>>> testing the spec, and I have a lot more confidence in the >>>> correctness of >>>> a test that all implementations pass than one that only some pass. >>> >>> Yes, sorry, I actually meant to add a paragraph with more information >>> for the people who don't care about process-wrangling. >>> >>> All the results (careful, it's a bit big) >>> http://w3c.github.io/test-results/html/all.html >>> >>> Things that fail everywhere >>> http://w3c.github.io/test-results/html/complete-fails.html >>> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 6 June 2014 16:12:58 UTC