- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:05:39 +0000
- To: public-html@w3.org
On 12/02/2014 16:34, Predrag Stojadinovic wrote: > This kind of message deserves no response. Why? Because it gives a succint, quantifiable answer to the "why would this be bad" question, and by doing so proves that your idea is not really a good one? I see... P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke ______________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 17:06:01 UTC