- From: Futomi Hatano <futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:54:12 +0900
- To: public-html@w3.org
Hi all, Let me give a feedback which has discussed in the web developers community in Japan (a.k.a. html5j). We've discussed on the content model of the rtc element specified in HTML5 spec. The content model of the rtc element includes only Phrasing content. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/CR/text-level-semantics.html#the-rtc-element Meanwhile, the category of the rt element is None. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/CR/text-level-semantics.html#the-rt-element This means that the rt element can't be a child of the rtc element for the purpose of the content model, becasuse the category of the rt element is not Phrasing content. But the rt element can be a child of the rtc element according to the description of the ruby element. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/CR/text-level-semantics.html#the-ruby-element I think that the content model of the rtc element should be as follows: -- Either: Phrasing content Or: one or more rt elements -- What do you think? Cheers, Futomi -- Newphoria Corporation Chief Technology Officer Futomi Hatano -- futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp http://www.newphoria.co.jp/
Received on Monday, 10 February 2014 01:54:30 UTC