- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:14:20 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
On 13/04/2014 06:36 , Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> On 04/11/2014 09:41 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: >>> >>>> HTMLMediaElement.addTextTrack - Discussed at F2F meeting >>> >>> >>> I tried to find out from the minutes why addTextTrack is at risk, but >>> it was only mentioned without reasons. >> >> >> From http://www.w3.org/2014/04/09-html-wg-minutes.html : >> >> ... lots of failures on HTMLMediaElement.addTextTrack >> ... mostly failing at the moment > > That's what I saw. I dug around a bit and assume it's based on this test: > http://w3c.github.io/html/test-results/less-than-2.html#test-file-62 > > At first sight, I think the test might expect the wrong kinds of errors. > Will investigate. I believe that there were indeed issues with the tests here. IMHO that's one of the most useful aspects of this exercise: discovering bad tests :) -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 14 April 2014 10:14:30 UTC