Re: New responsive images proposal

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Jirka Kosek <> wrote:
> On 27.9.2013 11:31, Robin Berjon wrote:
>> As a responsive images proposal, it certainly has a number of
>> interesting properties. It address the use cases well while catering to
>> fallback and without excessively crazy syntax.
> I think that proposal is first which would introduce numbered attributes
> like src1, src2, ..., srcN. I think that we should be very careful
> before opening this can of worms.

Thematically, it's similar to other attributes that come in groups,
like data-*.  But yes, this is somewhat new.  I don't like it much,
but it was required in order to avoid either using elements or having
a single super-complicated syntax.


Received on Friday, 27 September 2013 22:41:55 UTC