- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jukka.k.korpela@kolumbus.fi>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 23:04:26 +0300
- To: public-html@w3.org
2013-09-27 22:42, Brendan Long wrote: > Sorry if this is a stupid question, but the use of media queries in the > src attribute brings up an interesting question: Why don't we just let > the src attribute be specified by CSS? > > <img alt="A cat" src="default-cat.jpeg" class="cat" /> > > img.cat { > @media (max-width: 600px) { > src: "smaller-cat.jpeg"; > } > @media (max-width: 400px) { > src: "even-smaller-cat.jpeg"; > } > } > That way, the approach would deviate quite a lot from the overall structure of CSS. You don’t set element attributes in CSS, and you don’t use @media queries inside rules. I’m not saying this would impossible, just that it would probably be too different from design principles applied so far. But there’s a different approach to implementing a similar idea. Just use @media queries as currently defined and implemented, and use CSS code like @media (max-width: 600px) { img.cat { content: url(smaller-cat.jpeg) } } This is currently defined only in the CSS3 Generated Content Module, a very old WD (from 2003), but this part of it has been implemented in Opera, Safari, and Chrome. -- Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Received on Friday, 27 September 2013 20:04:49 UTC