- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:39:26 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Cc: "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 12:40:36 UTC
i have just filed a related *Bug 23545*<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23545>- section should only map to region if the section has an accessible name -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 21 March 2013 10:02, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: > Hi, > > there are increasing concerns over the excessive use of <section>. Some > authors seem to basically think of it as "sexy modern <div>" for no > particular reason (a good example: http://lockerz.com/). > > The specification does have some advice about only using <section> for > content that is meant to appear in the document outline, but given that the > outline doesn't show up anywhere, that's not something that's ever likely > to stop this drift. > > I've therefore been wondering: would it make sense to make section invalid > if it does not have heading content as its direct children? Put > differently, what are the use cases for a headless section? > > -- > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon > >
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 12:40:36 UTC