- From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 13:22:41 +0100
- To: "Robin Berjon" <robin@w3.org>, "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
- Cc: "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 08:05:07 +0100, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote: > Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, 2013-09-19 17:18 +0200: > >> I opened a bug about this[0] but I'd like it to see broader discussion. >> >> As per Web Components today[1], elements that contain a hyphen in their >> names are clearly laid open for third-party extensibility (a few >> exceptions are listed, grandfathered from MathML and SVG). >> >> I'd be more comfortable if HTML were the one to make that promise, and >> also if it made it more explicitly. Furthermore, I think that the >> logical conclusion from that is that where validators are concerned, >> elements containing hyphens ought to always just be considered valid. > > I don't think that would be a good idea. I'm with Mike, essentially for the reasons he outlined so far. Opening a big hole in the spec means we lose a lot of ability to test if things are correct. And except where conformance is rigourously enforced (in the kingdom of the unicorns), tools are able to allow extensibility anyway. cheers -- Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 09:23:11 UTC