- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:07:09 +0000
- To: "Jens O. Meiert" <jens@meiert.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+Vm_r42aurCCFDn26r2hOL3o=h9pifVzWYqO_d1Xo-Weeg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jens, As noted earlier I summarized the situation in > <http://meiert.com/en/blog/20131003/breadcrumbs-in-html/> ; I’d not like to ride this horse for much longer but it would help if you could elaborate on the decision to use lists. My view is that they’re not necessary. feedback from (AT) users appears to indicate that when there are links of lists its useful to have them marked up as a list. -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 16 October 2013 16:58, Jens O. Meiert <jens@meiert.com> wrote: > > Hi all after reviewing the discussion and other input I have made some > > changes to the example: > > Seems sound, though do you mind elaborating on the second point? > > > 2. have changed it from a OL to UL as in practice i think it makes little > > difference in this case, the relationship of precedence is provide by the > > use of the right arrows (thanks jens) to indicate path. > > As noted earlier I summarized the situation in > <http://meiert.com/en/blog/20131003/breadcrumbs-in-html/>; I’d not > like to ride this horse for much longer but it would help if you could > elaborate on the decision to use lists. My view is that they’re not > necessary. > > -- > Jens O. Meiert > http://meiert.com/en/ >
Received on Monday, 11 November 2013 11:08:27 UTC