- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 11:08:08 +0100
- To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 22/05/2013 10:52, Ian Devlin wrote: > I'd argue that the content within small print is often more important > than its surrounding content, rather than the opposite. Ian, yes. However, there's a reason why people make small print...small. Be it for reasons of space, or to be mildly deceptive, that's their intent. If the authors felt that something is actually more important, they'd make it more prominent - they don't. This definition takes into account the *author's intent*. This may be opposite to the *reader's intent*, but such is the problem with semantics (they represent what the author intended, which may be different from the recipient's interpretation/needs). P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke ______________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2013 10:08:39 UTC