W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2013

RE: Question on "phrasing content" definition

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:14:25 -0600
To: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
CC: "'Silvia Pfeiffer'" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, 'PÄ“teris Å…ikiforovs' <peteris.nikiforovs@tilde.lv>, <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002201ce5248$0e4997b0$2adcc710$@com>
> We have the "script" special case since that is clear.
> For everything else I'd be as conservative as possible and 
> not list too much, to avoid ambiguity.

agreed.

In addition to Silvia's <scrip>, Karl's <iframe> and <noscript> are certainly possible candidate for "nested".

I'll try to go through the elements today and come with a possible list a ambiguous cases and proposed defaults.

-ys
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 15:15:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:46:02 UTC