- From: Mallory van Achterberg <stommepoes@stommepoes.nl>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 15:45:20 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 02:26:31PM +0100, Steve Faulkner wrote: > disclaimer: its an off the cuff idea only! > > I have been musing on the idea of using strong to signify the title part > of a heading that has title and subtitle: > > <h1><strong>title</strong> subtitle</h1> > > would be interested to get others thoughts on the pattern > > > -- > > Regards > > SteveF > HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> No me gusta: means changing meaning of strong (for a second time), and UAs would have to check parent of strong to decide which meaning it has. Strong also doesn't solve the mottos/slogans/taglines/banners issue people were using multiple headings+hgroup for, since for me those things never belonged in hx tags to begin with. I think I don't generally like the idea of one tag having two very different, contextual meanings, though I'm sure someone already does and I'm just not coming up with them at the moment. Still think the idea of saying "everyone sibling to hx inside a <header> tag has some special association with the hx" is nicer since then the tags still keep their actual normal original meaning and can encompass non-subtitle content. Including images. Not entirely certian what the special association would be, if any, unless rel attributes could somehow be used. <header><hx id="foo">Meijer</hx><p rel="foo">Why Pay More?</p></header> -Mallory
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 13:46:09 UTC