Re: Validity constraints on <section>

>To be absolutely clear, the above you cite was in the context of requiring
that the heading be the first element child. Indeed it doesn't break
content, but it does switch the validity flag on content that I think is
arguably fine — which isn't fair.

right I didn't mean in the context of that strict constraint



with regards

--
SteveF
HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
 <http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html>


On 21 March 2013 11:14, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote:

> On 21/03/2013 12:08 , Steve Faulkner wrote:
>
>>  >but I think it would break too much existing content
>>
>> nothing would be broken, there is no change in implementation, some
>> stuff (which is crufty anyway) may become non conforming if run through
>> a validator.
>>
>
> To be absolutely clear, the above you cite was in the context of requiring
> that the heading be the first element child. Indeed it doesn't break
> content, but it does switch the validity flag on content that I think is
> arguably fine — which isn't fair.
>
>
> --
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
>