- From: Ian Devlin <ian@iandevlin.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 20:28:03 +0100
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOYOhSvsm+o+U8TMVEHJwiGAt-=vtqRCGY8U1gZh-iq7EJQCfw@mail.gmail.com>
I like the idea of being able to link two <h> elements together, i.e. indicating that they are linked together and should be treated as such, although the content within the <h1> is more important* * given the example <hgroup> <h1>Headline</h1> <h2>Subheadline</h2> </hgroup> However what use knowing this relationship might be I'm not quite sure. On 6 March 2013 20:16, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the discussion so far! > > In regards to use cases, the only stated use case for <hgroup> is/was[1]: > > "The point of hgroup is to hide the subtitle from the outlining > algorithm. " > > Its only stated reason for being in HTML is to support a non essential > case in an algorithm that is not implemented in any browser > > I suggest a good starting point for supporting the continued inclusion of > <hgroup> in HTML would be to provide some use cases that actually warrant > the element. > > It should also be noted that hiding a subtitle from the outline algorithm > is no longer a requirement as the following was added to the spec some time > last year: > > How a user agent exposes such multi-level headings in user interfaces >> (e.g. in tables of contents or search results) is left open to >> implementors, as it is a user interface issue. The first example above >> could be rendered as: >> >> The reality dysfunction: Space is not the only void >> >> > So what are the use cases for <hgroup>? > > regards > SteveF > > [1] > http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Rationale#hgroup_and_other_heading_elements > [2] > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/sections.html#the-hgroup-element > > > On 6 March 2013 14:26, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> as you may know I have been a long time critic of the <hgroup>[1] element >> for a number of reasons including: >> >> it promotes an anti-pattern of multiples Hx's to indicate subheadings. >> >> I call it an anti-pattern as >> * the pattern of using a heading to indicate a sub heading does not >> convey clearly that a particular heading is in fact a sub heading. >> * this pattern was not a common pattern, and is still not a common >> pattern (grepping data from 35000 web pages [6]) >> * the markup patterns and use of classes to indicate >> subheadings/subtitles etc in web content (grepped data set [6]) supports a >> feature more like <subline>[7] than <hgroup> >> * the heading semantics are still exposed to users that consume them >> (resulting in additional cognitive noise for no benefit and confusion as a >> heading typically prefixes and labels non heading content and is not >> followed by one or more headings) >> * as currently specified in HTML5 (must level requirement- but not >> implemented by any user agent) [2] the use of <hgroup> has the effect on >> accessibility layer semantics of concatenating headings and 'subheadings' >> into one heading: >> >> <hgroup> >> <h1>heading</h1> >> <h1>sub heading</h1> >> </hgroup> >> >> becomes >> >> <h1>heading subheading <h1> >> >> which effectively removes any notion of a subheading semantic for users >> and any way for it to be conveyed via an accessibility API. >> >> There have been a number of proposals in regards to >> modification/removal/alternatives to <hgroup> [3] and as <hgroup> does not >> currently have 2 reasonably complete interoperable implementations ( CSS >> and parsing are implemented, but the accessibility semantics are not so it >> is effectively nothing more than a div by another name.) I requested that >> it be dropped from HTML5.0 [4]. The request will come up for a decision on >> 12th March[5]. >> >> Questions arise as to what to do with <hgroup> for HTML 5.1. >> >> My suggestion is to make it obsolete and provide authoring advice in the >> common idioms section about how to markup subheadings using existing HTML >> elements- illustrative examples: >> >> <h1> heading >> <span class="subheading">sub heading</span> >> </h1> >> >> <header> >> <h1> heading </h1> >> <p>sub heading </p> >> </header> >> >> <div class="heading-group"> >> <h1> heading </h1> >> <p>sub heading </p> >> </div> >> >> >> My questions include: >> If we want to provide a subheading feature why not do so in a way that >> the semantics are clearly provided to any user that could consume them? >> If not then what is the use of hgroup other than a styling hook? >> >> what do others think? >> >> [1] >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/sections.html#the-hgroup-element >> [2] >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/dom.html#sec-strong-native-semantics >> [3] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/164 >> [4] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2012Dec/0019.html >> [5] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2012Dec/0073.html >> [6] data set used from http://webdevdata.org >> [7] http://www.html5accessibility.com/tests/subline.html >> -- >> with regards >> >> >> > > > -- ian devlin e: ian@iandevlin.com w: www.iandevlin.com t: @iandevlin <http://www.twitter.com/iandevlin> skype: idevlin buy my book: html5 multimedia: develop and design<http://html5multimedia.com>
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 19:28:37 UTC