- From: Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:44:34 +0000
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- CC: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Following up on my own post, this article provides technical web development advice: http://sampsonblog.com/615/ie10s-pseudo-elements It shows a <figure> in one example without a <figcaption>. While the example is demonstrating the use of pseudo-elements, it does so by using one to create a caption for a photo. A reader may take it to mean that this is the way to create captions. Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com> wrote: > From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 3:13 PM > > hi Adrian, > > why <figure> in this case, why not <p>? In short, I don't know. I mentioned this because I have seen this somewhere in the wild, I just cannot for the life of me find where I saw it (I've been looking). At the time I tried to understand why <figure> was chosen, couldn't, and filed it away in the place in my head where I store odd HTML element use. Otherwise I agree with Léonie. I cannot fathom a reason to do this, but I assume that's my own lack of creativity. > On 20 June 2013 19:38, Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com> wrote: > > From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 2:24 PM > > > > what are the use cases for a <figure> without a <figcaption>? > Gallery. Not just a photo gallery, but a gallery of samples (charts, screen > shots, videos, etc.). In that case you may not want to put a caption with > each, but you may want to reference them as "figures" of the work that > you do as part of a larger product/service pitch.
Received on Monday, 24 June 2013 00:45:02 UTC